DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

3 posters

Go down

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... Empty DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

Post by RVsaid August 20th 2023, 10:02 am

I picked up this rim damaged piece today with blurry morning eyes. If it hadn't been for the painted mark I probably would have left it behind however when I got home and found my glasses and well...... hmm there is someone locally paint marking modern import pieces and I do wonder if it is not one of theirs?

The glaze makes me feel / lean towards a modern piece though it is similar to those large brown salt cellars about.

Thoughts welcomed

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... P1740510

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... P1740512

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... P1740511

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... P1740514

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... P1740513

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... P1740515
RVsaid
RVsaid

Number of posts : 1461
Location : Torbay, England
Registration date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... Empty Re: DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

Post by benwilliams August 20th 2023, 3:26 pm

I’m only able to see small pics on my phone but it doesn’t look modern to me.
benwilliams
benwilliams

Number of posts : 2352
Location : Devon
Registration date : 2017-12-27

Back to top Go down

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... Empty Re: DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

Post by RVsaid August 20th 2023, 4:07 pm

Cheers Ben I appreciate your eye even if it was only with smaller images. The trouble is you get 1 posted reply and people can stop looking at the post
RVsaid
RVsaid

Number of posts : 1461
Location : Torbay, England
Registration date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... Empty Re: DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

Post by philpot August 20th 2023, 4:16 pm

How big is it? I would tend to agree with Ben though. The style and glazing looks rather old fashioned. Equally too perfectly formed to be studio made. It would simply not have been made by a Studio Potter in 1967.
philpot
philpot

Number of posts : 6476
Location : cambridge
Registration date : 2010-11-06

Back to top Go down

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... Empty Re: DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

Post by RVsaid August 20th 2023, 5:27 pm

Cheers Phil - you would be agreeing with me then and not Ben as I think it's probably modern. Only 14 inches high mind you so technically a shelf or floor vase.
RVsaid
RVsaid

Number of posts : 1461
Location : Torbay, England
Registration date : 2012-08-12

Back to top Go down

DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but..... Empty Re: DY mark, I would like to think this is a 1967 Studio Floor Vase but.....

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum