Home
Search
Register
Log inLidded Pot with no marks
Page 1 of 1
Lidded Pot with no marks
by fridolina on October 9th 2020, 2:45 pm
I know it’s a tall order but I’ve always loved this “minty” pot.
fridolina- Number of posts : 33
Location : United Kingdom
Registration date : 2020-09-07
Re: Lidded Pot with no marks
by NaomiM on October 9th 2020, 5:59 pm
Skegness or Briglin? But without a mark it'll be difficult to be certain; they weren't the only potteries to use this combination of clay and glaze
_________________
Just my personal opinion, take it or leave it.
NaomiM- Administrator
-
Number of posts : 22485
Location : Hampshire
Registration date : 2012-05-15
Re: Lidded Pot with no marks
by Grumpy Grandad on October 9th 2020, 10:31 pm
Skegness was my first thought. The glaze is very thick on the underside so it's possible that a mark has been in-filled. I've seen a few pieces of Skegness with the mark on the side of the body at the bottom.
It might be worth going around the bottom and sides with a strong torch; it may be possible to see the 'ghost' of a mark that way.
It might be worth going around the bottom and sides with a strong torch; it may be possible to see the 'ghost' of a mark that way.
Grumpy Grandad- Number of posts : 714
Location : E. Midlands UK
Registration date : 2019-11-11
Re: Lidded Pot with no marks
by NaomiM on October 11th 2020, 12:53 am
Looks like a Briglin base, although also similar to Skegness.
_________________
Just my personal opinion, take it or leave it.
NaomiM- Administrator
- Number of posts : 22485
Location : Hampshire
Registration date : 2012-05-15
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|