Little Pot unmarked - Winchcombe?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Little Pot unmarked - Winchcombe?

Post by 22 Crawford St. on May 17th 2016, 3:37 pm

Unmarked = Amateur? From EB 







avatar
22 Crawford St.

Male Number of posts : 1856
Location : Berkshire
Registration date : 2009-12-19

http://www.briglin.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Little Pot unmarked - Winchcombe?

Post by NaomiM on May 17th 2016, 7:45 pm

Beautiful. Definitely not amateur. Winchcombe, possibly? Unfortunately, without a mark it'll be very difficult to ID, but a quality piece

_________________
Just my personal opinion, take it or leave it.
avatar
NaomiM
Administrator
Administrator

Female Number of posts : 15618
Location : Hampshire
Registration date : 2012-05-15

Back to top Go down

Re: Little Pot unmarked - Winchcombe?

Post by 22 Crawford St. on May 17th 2016, 9:50 pm

Yeah add an AY. So my only hope is to find very similar but marked. 

:( 

Will keep half and an eye on Winchcombe as possiblity. TY
avatar
22 Crawford St.

Male Number of posts : 1856
Location : Berkshire
Registration date : 2009-12-19

http://www.briglin.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Little Pot unmarked - Winchcombe?

Post by studio-pots on May 17th 2016, 10:33 pm

Certainly by a professional potter but the size and lack of mark suggest to me that it might have been a trial piece i.e. trying out the glazes on a new stoneware body.

_________________
Now you should know by now that Potty and I need to see your bottom - we're funny that way!
avatar
studio-pots
Consultant
Consultant

Male Number of posts : 5265
Location : South East London
Registration date : 2011-02-17

http://www.studio-pots.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Little Pot unmarked - Winchcombe?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum